On Nov 4, 2013 12:01 PM, "Stephen Gallagher" <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/04/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > A quick update from my side regarding the Base Design WG:
> >
> > - My proposed committee was approved by FESCO last Wednesday. One
> > negative vote came from Stephen Gallagher that he would have very
> > much preferred to have Lennart instead of Harald or Josh on the
> > committee.
> >
>
> To be completely clear, I said I would have preferred having Lennart
> on the WG. I did not state that I thought Harald or Josh should not be
> members. That's an important distinction, I think :)
>
> I felt strongly enough that Lennart belonged on this group that I
> chose to cast a token vote, knowing that it would not affect the outcome.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlJ34PkACgkQeiVVYja6o6MrUwCgpYhhbnQ2eFX/c4Eb8bSAbBVs
> fB4AoIKJyckoVozKnZyh03E0MfMzmpxy
> =L79V
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Howdy folks.
Looking forward to getting to work on base design. Regarding the voting members I feel we have a great group. Everyone intersted (voting or not) should participate in our discussions. My vote will certainly be influenced by anyone in the community willing to participate. :-)
One thing I would like to talk about is embedded Fedora, mostly as that is my personal area of involvement with the project. There is not an embedded working group, and it's my agenda to hopefully have the base design double as embedded. It makes sense to me in the sense that base ring-zero is sort of the embedded core into cloud, server, or workstation. By itself base would be suitable for the smallest deployment.
Another item I'd like to consider for the initial discussion is the release cycle for the base design. My feeling is that base is small enough and simple enough to allow a more frequent release, perhaps even continuously. My guess is the other WGs will have their own ideas for how frequently they output. So base WG would need to be the lowest common denominator in that way. Obviouly rel-eng and qa need to represent for this topic. :-)
Thanks,
-Jon Disnard
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
