----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand > > It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That's just a > working title and indicative of the conversation at Flock. Peter Jones had > suggested "Fedora Client", and there were some others as well. Can we go one level up - should even Fedora be a name of a product? With Server/Workstation/Cloud and other as variants? Or can we treat Fedora as a project covering all different products using different names? You don't use M*soft Server but W*ows Server produced by that company... KDE guys tried this rebranding a long time ago, it never worked very well due to miscommunication in the very beginnings (KDE SC...). I was involved in discussion at Akademy with many red faces screaming "noo, don't do that, noo" but actually it makes sense. And even more sense to productised Fedora... Jaroslav > > -- > Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
