On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:25:18AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> > The Fedora Workstation effort (not a great name, by the way), is brand >> >> It doesn't have to end up with that name, for the record. That's just a >> working title and indicative of the conversation at Flock. Peter Jones had >> suggested "Fedora Client", and there were some others as well. > > Can we go one level up - should even Fedora be a name of a product? With > Server/Workstation/Cloud and other as variants? Or can we treat Fedora as > a project covering all different products using different names? > > You don't use M*soft Server but W*ows Server produced by that company... > > KDE guys tried this rebranding a long time ago, it never worked very well due > to miscommunication in the very beginnings (KDE SC...). I was involved in > discussion at Akademy with many red faces screaming "noo, don't do that, noo" > but actually it makes sense. And even more sense to productised Fedora... It kills a well known brand and all marketing efforts of the past. And the KDE one didn't really worked in the end everyone just calls it (the desktop) "KDE". -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
