Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design
>> > & implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board
>> > that is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of
>> > situation that Fedora would want to be in anyway.
>>
>> That's a very lame excuse for sticking with an awful desktop environment
>> as the default just because it is the status quo.
>
> Not excellent...please avoid insulting other people's hard work just
> because you are working on something else.
You got the causality wrong: It's not that I call GNOME "awful" because I
work on KDE, but that I work on KDE because GNOME does not fulfill my needs
and expectations at all. (Even GNOME 2 didn't, but GNOME 3 went even further
away from it.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
