On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design & > > implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board that > > is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of situation that > > Fedora would want to be in anyway. > > That's a very lame excuse for sticking with an awful desktop environment as > the default just because it is the status quo. Not excellent...please avoid insulting other people's hard work just because you are working on something else. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
