Bill Nottingham wrote:
> And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design &
> implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board that
> is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of situation that
> Fedora would want to be in anyway.
That's a very lame excuse for sticking with an awful desktop environment as
the default just because it is the status quo.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
