On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop >> prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed >> if the new Workstation ended up just an unchanged GNOME[1]. > [snip] >> [1] As opposed to any of 1) non-GNOME, 2) GNOME changed by Fedora, 3) >> GNOME upstream changing. I don't know enough to say whether any of >> these variants is generally preferred within FESCo. > > 2 features which would have changed that have been proposed over time: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KDE_Plasma_Desktop_by_default > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop > Both have been rejected by FESCo. Repeating myself, "I don't know enough to say whether any of these variants is generally preferred within FESCo.". Looking back at these two proposals in particular, they have one thing in common - they haven't been even supported by maintainers of the respective desktops. That made both proposals pretty much impossible to vote for. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
