Re: Lack of response about sponsorship

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:22 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> to step up and do so? Or we add another state sponsors could query for
> this?

I think this would very much be the best option. For instance, a couple
of us have been reviewing the gooey-karma package (like easy-karma, but
with a GUI!):

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839

but we're not sponsors. It'd be great if there was a bit we could flip
that said 'we think this package is good to go and the person is ready
to be sponsored, can a sponsor please have a look?'
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux