On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 15.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Florian Weimer: >> On 10/15/2013 09:10 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >>>> It depends, for example in this case prelink saves 33% of time (and battery): >>>> i=0;time while [ $i -lt 1000 ];do /usr/bin/gnome-open --help &>/dev/null;i=$[$i+1];done >>> >>> Do you really run "gnome-open --help" 1000 times per reasonable unit of >>> time (or ever)? Please stop using bogus comparisons and highly >>> contrived tests. They do nothing to help your argument. >> >> This isn't totally invalid. I assume that some shell scripts with tight loops are the only thing that actually >> benefits from prelinking today. People write those, unfortunately. > > it is - they are *not* loading a lot of dynmaic linked libraries > > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ldd /usr/bin/bash > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffc9764000) > libtinfo.so.5 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007f99b21aa000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f99b1fa6000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f99b1be4000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f99b23ee000) Yes because shell is a real programming language that does not have to start tons of other binaries to do useful stuff ... oh wait. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
