Re: prelink performance gains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:08:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.10.2013 21:05, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > It depends, for example in this case prelink saves 33% of time (and battery):
> > 	i=0;time while [ $i -lt 1000 ];do /usr/bin/gnome-open --help &>/dev/null;i=$[$i+1];done
> 
> where are the numbers?
> prove it!

33% is the number.  It was 2.848s vs. 4.291s, that is 33.63%.


> and after that start your brain and compare that numbers with
> the battery wasted by prelinking itself,

prelinking never runs on battery, or it is a bug if it does.
At least I run notebook 24x7 on AC and only occasionally I take it out with
battery, then prelink works perfectly for me as I have described it.


> nobody but you is running CGI these days
> anybody but you is using fast-cgi

OT: I use mod_perl for majority of my web code.


Jan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux