On 2013-08-22 17:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages
in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to
certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind of input. Also,
these test reveals some false warnings and other errors. Some are
detected and fixed, some certainly not. This is a lot of data.
The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw . Here
are some interesting findings such as a package with files in /buildroot
and more than 1200 packages without working source url. However, this
is basically excess information for me. Hereby shared.
--alec
Funny! I'm interested in hearing more about these,
| 347 CheckStaticLibs
| Static libs not in a -static package. Most are haskell packages
| which have an exception not handled by f-r. There are more, though.
since http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/staticbugstat.html is an ongoing
project. So far, I exclude Haskell and OCaml packages, Tcl/Tk stub libs,
flex-static, and the fake shared libs in binutils-devel (they are .so
GNU ld scripts that link with the static libs instead).
You have certainly better excludes than f-r. The packages failing f-r is
on http://ur1.ca/f5znn
Filed bugs on f-r: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/221
and https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/222.
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
