Re: Overall fedora-review test results.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:03:22 +0200
Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2013-08-22 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Yes... sorry I assumed you knew...
> >
> > <package>-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Richard
> No, I don't know much.
> 
> Well, it should basically be piece of cake to generate such an email
> for all  packages. Before doing such a thing I would certainly like
> to have some kind of conclusion that's is a good thing to do on this
> list. Not all of these email would contain relevant info.
> 
> There are alternatives. I could perhaps arrange a directory tree with
> a report for each package which is accessible to be less invasive.

Yeah, I would think a site/tree with the reports first at least would
be good. Folks on this list could look at their packages and see if
there's things that are false positives or could be fixed up in some
clean system wide way. 

Then, you could run again and mail owners a link to their packages
reports ? 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux