On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages > in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to > certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind of input. Also, > these test reveals some false warnings and other errors. Some are > detected and fixed, some certainly not. This is a lot of data. > > The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw . Here > are some interesting findings such as a package with files in /buildroot > and more than 1200 packages without working source url. However, this > is basically excess information for me. Hereby shared. > > --alec Funny! I'm interested in hearing more about these, | 347 CheckStaticLibs | Static libs not in a -static package. Most are haskell packages | which have an exception not handled by f-r. There are more, though. since http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/staticbugstat.html is an ongoing project. So far, I exclude Haskell and OCaml packages, Tcl/Tk stub libs, flex-static, and the fake shared libs in binutils-devel (they are .so GNU ld scripts that link with the static libs instead). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
