Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/22/2013 05:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
What things we do _now_ could be
improved with the investment of some effort?
Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect
the mass rebuild.

Apparently less so with all the new ARM builders, right?
Dunno.

Is this something
you're saying could be improved, or is it just something we always need to
budget time for?

The issue with this perl rebuilt was the person conducting the initial rebuild didn't manage to finish it. Don't get me wrong - He did a good job, but his time frame simply was unrealistically short.

This later on caused hickups during the official mass-rebuild, which still has its impact until today, because nobody has managed to fix some of the remaining bugs. When or even if these bugs can be overcome is still an open question.

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux