Am 15.08.2013 22:12, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > On 08/15/2013 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:36:53 -0400 >> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Interesting since they did not do that when I joined QA what 5 or 6 >>> years ago so again can you refer me to that discussion. >> It's always been a test case/critera that I remember... >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20070117#Fedora_7 >> >> Shows upgrade test cases were there in Fedora 7 and one of the things QA >> was testing and ensuring. > > We tested for it to a limited extent ( via yum ) but we never officially supported it. > > We always stayed away from opening that pandora box and it was not until we found out that someone had stamped > upgrades to be "officially" supported that we actually properly defined what should be tested, added the criteria > for it and made it release blocking honestly: if dist-upgrade swould not work *nobody* would use Fedora for anything relevant Fedora would be *completly* meaningless from this moment on why? because nobody has the time and effort to install from scratch twice a year if he does more with his computer than click on the icons of the default screen after login this is not only the point for Fedora *any* relevant software which would only work a few months would become meaningsless expect for people which are bored and play around just for fun with no goal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
