On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:04:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't see any harm I guess in fesco deciding that we are in favor in > general of this plan and ask the Board if we are going down a path they > don't want us to before writing up concrete proposals. Yeah, I was hoping to have discussion from Flock written up nicely for us to talk about at this meeting, but given the time and that I haven't eaten _breakfast_ yet, I don't think that's going to happen. For this meeting, I have several separate proposals: 1. In order to build what we need for the future of Fedora, FESCO endorses the idea of moving from a one-policy-fits-all-software policy to a tiered model as roughly laid out in http://mattdm.org/fedora/next, and recommends this to the board as the technical underpinning of our strategic direction. 2. FESCO-created working group to draft Fedora Base Design as called for in that proposal. 3. FESCO-created working group to draft Ring 2 policies and infrastructure needs. 4. Ask SCL team and FPC if they can find a way for SCL to be included in Fedora in F20 timeframe, within a special area of the current guidelines as a trial for ring 2 tech in Fedora. Also, not yet ready for a proposal but maybe for discussion: * We recommend Fedora move to a product-centered approach for designing, building, and marketing Fedora. * These products would be Fedora Workstation, Fedora Server, and Fedora Cloud (precise definitions to be developed), based around a common core shared wherever possible and with infrastructure for other groups based around other possible products to develop. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
