On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:41:37 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Additional agenda item: > > Mattdm, sgallagh, and I were talking about the general fesco sentiment > towards mattdm's fedora future direction proposal and the multiple > fedora products idea at post-flock breakfast. My understanding is > that the sentiment was that it would be a board decision whether to > go that route, that fesco would be on charge of implementing it, and > that fesco was generally in favour of it. > > The three of us thought it would be a good idea for fesco to > officially vote on whether we can get behind the idea and then send > it to the board so that we can start putting some proposals together. > > (Sorry for top-posting... on my phone.) Well, or would it be better to have a concrete proposal to take to them? I don't see any harm I guess in fesco deciding that we are in favor in general of this plan and ask the Board if we are going down a path they don't want us to before writing up concrete proposals. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
