On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:08:32PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > As for cruft in the spec files, why not bring a proposal to the FPC to > update the packaging guidelines stating that Fedora spec files must > not contain RHEL/EPEL macros? Then the git branches would be > maintained separately and the spec files might be more easily read. > Although this could be brought as a proposal to the FPC, I do not think it would pass. The macros greatly aid package maintainers to do their job more efficiently at a cost of only slightly more complex spec files. On a similar note, I don't think we even have a current rule about conditionals for non-Fedora-family (OpenSuse, mandriva, etc) packages. (If someone thinks we do and can find a link to it, pleases point it out to me. I wanted to refer to it a few weeks ago because I thought it was something we carried over from fedora.us days but I was unable to find it.) -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpeWMQFurEPs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
