On 07/17/2013 06:49 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/17/2013 03:48 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> Note that the argument comes from the same group of people >> who pushed for mounting tmpfs on /run and /tmp. > > So you prefer to have a fragile boot code to empty /run and do you want to be consistent with what other distribution suse/debian/arch and solaris are doing? > > If you want to disable tmp on tmpfs simple run|"||systemctl mask tmp.mount" ||| > >> My machine: >> >> # df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> tmpfs 3.9G 4.5M 3.9G 1% /run >> tmpfs 3.9G 4.9M 3.9G 1% /tmp >> >> 10 megs of *RAM* consumed. >> >> My /var/log/messages is 12 megabytes at the moment. >> >> These same people feel offended by "wasted" 12 megs of *disk space*? >> Please... > > Yes 10 megs of *RAM* consumed by *you* on *your* machine based on *your* setup > > Same folders on my fully updated always running F18 work laptop > > tmpfs 1.9G 1.2M 1.9G 1% /run > tmpfs 1.9G 372K 1.9G 1% /tmp > > less then 2MB of *RAM* consumed > > du -hs /var/log/ --exclude=/var/log/journal > 6.1M /var/log/ > > And 6.1M of wasted diskspace on my SSD > > And your point being? My point is that it is hypocritical to decry a "huge performance cost" of /var/log/messages one day and next day eat many megabytes of RAM and claim that "it's not a big deal". -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
