On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:31:56PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 07/15/2013 08:29 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 02:46:27PM -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> >>I don't actually care whether there's a binary journal or not, but far
> >>more of us have real usecases for /var/log/messages, so we shouldn't
> >>give up that being available by default.
> >If you use bash or ksh you could just replace /var/log/messages with
> ><(journalctl) in your command line and stuff should just work (when
> >reading). Other shells can probably do the same. It obviously depends on
> >journalctl being able to run.
> What about scripts that use /usr/bin/logger? Do messages generated by this utility
> end up in the journal? Or php scripts, or programs using syslog(3).
Yes. Even now, all syslog messages pass through journald.
Zbyszek
--
they are not broken. they are refucktored
-- alxchk
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
