On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 20:12 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-05-15 19:55:17) > > On 05/15/2013 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > As you can see from the output at the end of my email, not everyone does > > > it ;-) > > Yeah. I am not surprised at all. Automating as much as possible is the > > only efficient way to handle it > > To play the devil's advocate a bit, if we automate it without requiring announce > we end up without any additional info about reasons why package was orphaned. > > So I'd say announce mail could probably go from "MUST" to "Nice to have". I.e. > please explain to prospective new maintainers what to be aware of. > > Anyway, I am a fan of automation so +1 to this whole thing at least as a test > run. It's not visible from your example output, but if the owner just changed > from person A to person B instead to orphan, it would be 1 change instead of > A->orphan, orphan->B correct? If both happened in the period considered yes > I would probably say daily reports would be overkill. Weekly could be perhaps > too long? If I think about it I'd probably invent some crazy complicated stuff > so...just pick some schedule and be prepared to change if people complain :-) That's easy enough to adjust but should also be easy enough to set a filter to ignore it :) Thanks for the feedback, Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
