Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-05-15 19:55:17) > On 05/15/2013 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > As you can see from the output at the end of my email, not everyone does > > it ;-) > Yeah. I am not surprised at all. Automating as much as possible is the > only efficient way to handle it To play the devil's advocate a bit, if we automate it without requiring announce we end up without any additional info about reasons why package was orphaned. So I'd say announce mail could probably go from "MUST" to "Nice to have". I.e. please explain to prospective new maintainers what to be aware of. Anyway, I am a fan of automation so +1 to this whole thing at least as a test run. It's not visible from your example output, but if the owner just changed from person A to person B instead to orphan, it would be 1 change instead of A->orphan, orphan->B correct? I would probably say daily reports would be overkill. Weekly could be perhaps too long? If I think about it I'd probably invent some crazy complicated stuff so...just pick some schedule and be prepared to change if people complain :-) -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
