Re: Daily package ownership changes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/15/2013 02:12 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
To play the devil's advocate a bit, if we automate it without requiring announce
we end up without any additional info about reasons why package was orphaned.

This is a easily solvable problem. pkgdb can just require the maintainer to specify the reason for orphaning and the report can collect that info and post it here There are lots of things we could improve by just making reports more widely available automatically and some requires more tooling and we are doing a fairly poor job currently.

1) review reports - was absent for a long time and is now being done manually
2) e-v-r problems  - sporadic reports
3) reports on source url which don't work - havent been done in a llong time afaik and needs to be automated and way to silence them in known cases in a per package way (by checking in a file into the git repo for that package for instance) 4) rpmlint reports could be collected in a central location and per package way to silence irrelevant warnings/errors could be added. refer to debian lintian site for some examples 5) update to new upstream versions in Rawhide - a tool could do bump the spec, do scratch builds automatically of newer versions, if that works ask the maintainer to apply a diff after reviewing the changes. 6) abi bumps could trigger rebuilds as needed automatically by the buildsystem. Several distributions including Mageia, Mandriva, openSUSE has been doing this for ages already 7) spec file changelog vs git changelog could be automated and has been discussed multiple times here and again done by multiple distributions 8) koji web ui needs to be improved significantly or dropped/replaced with something that provides more functionality
9) reports highlighting unfixed security issues
10) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring should ideally be done for *all* packages and maintainers should be able to opt in for notification or see it in a web UI as per their choice 11) automatic period rebuilds in rawhide to highlight FTBFS issues aren't done as often anymore
12) file dependencies can be checked to make sure they are sane

I could go on but you get the general idea

Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux