On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 14:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:20:01 +0000 > Debarshi Ray <rishi.is@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ...snip... > > > I think it would be a much better use of our time to audit and test > > updates than writing %changelogs that can be understood by laymen. > > Spot had a plan related to this. basically bundle up monthly updates to > all critpath (non security) stuff, QA it, and then push it out as a > bundle. I see one problem with this approach: we're bound to have some update slipping into stable which breaks something that isn't caught in testing. If we do something like that, there needs to be a "fast lane" for updates fixing such broken updates so people don't have to wait a month for the fix. Unless... > People using yum/other tools directly could keep doing whatever they > currently do. ...this means that these "bundles" mean something additional to the normal repositories. I don't know about Spot's plan you mentioned, where can I find information about it? Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nils@xxxxxxxxxx nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
