Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I see one problem with this approach: we're bound to have some update
> slipping into stable which breaks something that isn't caught in
> testing. If we do something like that, there needs to be a "fast lane"
> for updates fixing such broken updates so people don't have to wait a
> month for the fix. Unless...

Yes, ofcourse.

To me the idea is loosely analogous to having freezes before a release, and
there is always the possibility of freeze breaks, exceptions and what not.

> I don't know about Spot's plan you mentioned, where
> can I find information about it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCE4dBCowRk

Cheers,
Debarshi


-- 
If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars
and electricity would have done it too.  -- Arjun Shankar

Attachment: pgppPSHMT_8wM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux