On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:41:03PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > That assumes that using Firefox is somehow more difficult than Epiphany > (in this context). Which it is not, you don't need to fiddle around with > dozens of options to get it working, it "just works". So does Epiphany, > but it lacks many real-world useful features which both Mozilla and > Firefox have. *Especially* since Firefox is cross-platform, and is starting to gain noticeable overall marketshare. It's very likely that new users will have heard of Firefox before even if they haven't used it. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
