On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 14:55, Ricardo Veguilla wrote: > On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 14:35 +0200, Lars E. Pettersson wrote: ... > > Perhaps a systems default is a bad choice, perhaps we should have one > > default for Gnome, one for Kde, one for xfce, and so on. > > > > That was also my conclusion. > > Quite frankly if the KDE developers/user don't care what Fedora puts as > a default browser (I'm not saying thats the case, I'm just speculating) > then fine by me. They care, and do not like it. Look at discussions regarding RedHat/Fedora and Kde during the years... I do not want Fedora to be known as a "Gnome distribution", I would like it to be regarded as a "Linux/GNU distribution". I.e. I think we may put off some users by mixing different desktop defaults, and making one desktops default the system default. Ok, I am not sure that we will come to any conclusion on this. We seem to agree that different defaults for different desktops is better than a systems default. Lets hope that this is what will happen in future Fedora releases. Regarding having Epiphany as default, be it Gnome, or as default, I think we have to agree to disagree... :-) Lars -- Lars E. Pettersson <lars@xxxxxxxx> http://www.sm6rpz.se/
