On 06/03/13 09:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:31:06 -0800
Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We do already have an AutoQA test which runs rpmguard, and rpmguard
notes dependency/provision version changes. Here it is spotting an
ABI bump for binutils:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/531743-autotest/qa02.qa/rpmguard/results/binutils-2.23.52.0.1.html
Now, whether you'd want to somehow parse such results out from the
existing rpmguard test externally, or write a new more specific test,
or do something else, or dance a little jig, is a different question.
But to a certain extent we're Already Doing That. The rpmguard test
is currently entirely informational, no policies are enforced, but
you can go read the output if you want to be an informed package
maintainer...
Sure. Note however that we don't currently run autoqa on rawhide builds
and that was at least the initial target for this. ;)
Um. I think we do? I see results from rpmguard (and other tests) for
builds with 'fc19' in them at
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend , right now.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
