On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:31:06 -0800 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We do already have an AutoQA test which runs rpmguard, and rpmguard > notes dependency/provision version changes. Here it is spotting an > ABI bump for binutils: > > http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/531743-autotest/qa02.qa/rpmguard/results/binutils-2.23.52.0.1.html > > Now, whether you'd want to somehow parse such results out from the > existing rpmguard test externally, or write a new more specific test, > or do something else, or dance a little jig, is a different question. > But to a certain extent we're Already Doing That. The rpmguard test > is currently entirely informational, no policies are enforced, but > you can go read the output if you want to be an informed package > maintainer... Sure. Note however that we don't currently run autoqa on rawhide builds and that was at least the initial target for this. ;) But yeah, good test to know... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
