Am 15.02.2013 23:15, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > On 02/15/2013 09:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote: >> On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >>> On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote: >>>> There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.service. >>> Hmm.. >>> >>> It's probably better to have an mariadb own unit files and create >>> corresponding mysql symbolic link to those unit files for backwards >>> compatibility at install time. >>> ( we already do so at few places to keep backwards compatibility with >>> the service command to systemd units in few places ) >> I don't understand what would be the benefit, except that the files wouldn't conflict, but the packages conflict >> anyway currently. > > User expectations as in if you install something called mariadb then it's expected that you start the service via > systemctl start mariadb.service ( or service mariadb start ) to fullfill them really it would need a alias in the one or other direction - most people will type "systemctl start mysqld.service" and have a big WTF if they need to seacrh the web besides real compatibility and transition of data one of the reasons why in my opinion it is pretty dumb to hurry this for F10 instead take a breath and come up with a well planned fianl decision in F20, mysql 5.5 is maintained uptream for a long time and nobody will eat it away
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
