On 15/02/13 02:15 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 09:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.service.
Hmm..
It's probably better to have an mariadb own unit files and create
corresponding mysql symbolic link to those unit files for backwards
compatibility at install time.
( we already do so at few places to keep backwards compatibility with
the service command to systemd units in few places )
I don't understand what would be the benefit, except that the files
wouldn't conflict, but the packages conflict anyway currently.
User expectations as in if you install something called mariadb then
it's expected that you start the service via systemctl start
mariadb.service ( or service mariadb start ).
Either way, we don't need symlinks, do we? systemd already lets you set
aliases.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
