Am 16.02.2013 01:29, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:05:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> * even MySQL 5.5 had a HIDDEN soname break on a minor update with the >> need of rebuild depending packages and now people will explain me >> that two different forks are binary compatible - this is very >> thin ice and can break with ANY minor update >> > AFAICT, this is a different question. IIUC, the plan is for clients to link > to the mariadb provided libraries. The mysql package would not ship client > libraries. So we're talking about protocol compatibility, not about library > SONAME/ABI compatibility and which fool has written the feature page without knowing what binary compatibility is or if he knows to get the Fesco OK by promise impossible things there? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB MariaDB is binary compatible with MySQL of the same major version, so we don't need to change anything in packages depending on libmysqlclient.so
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
