Re: ConsoleKit and esound retirement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Ciesla wrote:
> That said, I maintain gnugb, and was able to easily remove the esound
> requirement.

What sound output options does that leave? I see only arts-devel in the 
BuildRequires list, and that's actually worse than esound, because it 
requires running another sound server from KDE 3 era on top of PulseAudio 
(which gets autospawned, but it unnecessarily eats resources), whereas the 
ESD protocol is emulated by PulseAudio.

I'd suggest dropping arts support (to squelch dependency bloat) and 
reenabling esound now that it got picked up (unless there's ALSA support 
which works with the PulseAudio ALSA plugin, then you can drop both arts and 
esound).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux