Le mercredi 13 février 2013 à 12:58 -0800, Dan Mashal a écrit : > > On Feb 13, 2013 10:58 AM, "Lennart Poettering" <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13.02.13 02:44, Dan Mashal (dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > Please can we test this on rawhide first if anything? I'm pretty > sure a lot > > > of thing are still ck dependant. We are still trying to catch up > to systemd. > > > > So, in contrast to the esound discussion I do not sense too much > > opposition to me just retiring CK. So I'd probably do that in > Rawhide > > next week or so. CK would hence disappear in F19, but would give > > everybody time until the branch or freeze or so to fix their > packages... > > > > Lennart > > > > -- > > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Sorry if I sound ignorant but: > > No. I meant fedora 20 rawhide. What is the problem with keeping it? > > Are we just trying to break something different every time we release > a new version of Fedora? > > Regardless, do you know exactly what depends on consolekit and what > doesn't? Have you gone through every package? That's a valid concern. While the list of packages requiring consolekit are quite small ( ie, 3 packages, 1 being a shell script with support to disable ck ), we cannot really check those using the dbus interface in a exhaustive way. However, I have already removed consolekit on my F18 without any notable issue, so I do not think any breakage would be blocking. We have the whole F19 cycle to find and detect the few packages needing fix. -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
