On Tue, 12.02.13 13:52, Jon Ciesla (limburgher@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > So to clarify, you're not actually retiring anything currently, just > > > expressing to the community that you'd like to and that we should work > > > toward making that possible? > > > > Well, I am just checking before I do something whether I can actually do > > it. That's all. By next week or so I will either have retired the > > packages (which I'd prefer) or somebody else took them over (which I'd > > prefer not to do, but which we can do too, if the retro-computing folks > > step up...) > > I'd prefer that you orphan them, and mail the list, ccing <foo>-owner for > each dependency, that you're doing so. That said, I maintain gnugb, and > was able to easily remove the esound requirement. If no one else wants to > maintain esound, I will, even if only long enough to excise it from the > packages that need it. OK, if that's what you want. I have now orphaned esound. Please take it over. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
