> Let me say one thing: if you're going by examples, go with proper ones. > There is vast difference of work needed to support two kernels and work > needed to support two office suites. You know kernel is the base upon > everything runs, right? Please, don't make the most basic component > that cannot be even switched without a whole lot of work as an example > for choices. Why not? We have ConnMan and upstart in the repos already. The way things are going I won't be surprised if someone sincerely proposed it. In fact a feature page was written which turned out to be a hoax. > You just cannot support two kernels in one distribution. Such distros do exist. I don't think that the guiding principle should be: "here is some FOSS code, lets package it". Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar
Attachment:
pgpF6ywSyu2C8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
