> There are better ways to highlight that not to mention the examples you > used already exist in Fedora. So do we have multiple kernels in Fedora? We offer .deb variants of Fedora? > That doesn't solve the existing problem at all. There is no reason why we > should have say Epiphany but exclude Apache Openoffice. Because we moved away from OpenOffice.org towards LibreOffice, and then AOO appeared on the horizon. Epiphany or Firefox do not share such a history. For what it is worth, I would very much like to streamline things there too, which is why I said initially: "lets not make it any worse than it already is". (Once upon a time Epiphany had multiple backends, before it adopted WebKit as the only one [1]. So we atleast gave up on some "choice" there.) Cheers, Debarshi [1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2008-April/msg00000.html -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar
Attachment:
pgpJ7f7qEjVR4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
