>> <sarcasm> >> So what is the next step? Offering another kernel? Or allowing us to choose >> a different package manager or packing format? Oh, wait, using multiple >> different depsolvers has already been frowned upon. >> >> Now why did *that* happen? It is Fedora, isn't it? >> </sarcasm> >> > > Sarcasm isn't going to resolve the problems. But it might highlight the problem with this "lets have some more choices" madness. > If you have a proposal, > let's hear it. Removing all the alternatives isn't an option. Is it? You already heard it: "don't make it worse than it already is". > Users don't care where LO comes from at all. Then how will you empower them to make a choice between LO and AOO? How will you ensure that bugs don't get misfiled? Every now and then I get bugs arising out of forks and downstream patches that get misfiled by confused users. Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar
Attachment:
pgpLyg1B5fopq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
