>> <sarcasm> >> So what is the next step? Offering another kernel? Or allowing us to choose >> a different package manager or packing format? Oh, wait, using multiple >> different depsolvers has already been frowned upon. > > <deadpan> > On an F18 system > yum info smart > yum info dpkg > </deadpan> You do know the difference between "frowned upon" and "banned", right? For starters: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/669 If you dig you will atleast one more. > Please don't confuse the discussion concerning "default" choices with > a discussion as to what is allowable to include for end-users to > choose from. The point was to refute the "this is Fedora, so we want more choices" argument. Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar
Attachment:
pgphFDeM8LzVG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
