Am 05.02.2013 22:21, schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga: > On 05/02/13 12:09 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >> In the Gnome2 days you had choices between functionally similar DEs. >> >> Times have changed ... Gnome has been forked multiply (Gnome3, MATE, Cinammon), xfce/enlightenment are back. >> > Gnome 3 is still Gnome. Both MATE and Cinnamon which came years after Gnome 3 via Gnome-Shell, are reactionary for > self-interest because these DE can easily reproduced through Gnome-Shell extensions meaning they will become > irrelevant in a future and if the developers (in this case GNOME developers) would be less ignorant while punish their users they would never became relevent because there would have been no reason to fork > because these DE can easily reproduced through Gnome-Shell extensions and why the hell did upstream not do this work from the very frist beginning? my definition of REwrite and optimize is * clean up the code base * provide the same functionality as before * fix bugs * release
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
