On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, IMHO reading the bug it just sounds like to me a mistake was made > and the obsoletes/conflicts was not removed as intended: > > +* Sun Nov 4 2012 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-5-20121024 > +- don't conflict with latexmk (#868996) > > (but that version didn't change obsoletes/conflicts at all) Ah, that makes sense. > I'd suggest instead just mailing jnovy and asking if that was a mistake > and if he could push the correct fix before jumping to conclusions. Hmm, I didn't think I had jumped to any conclusions. That's why I was patiently waiting for a response on the bug. I only spoke up because I was afraid that the appearance of latexmk on this list meant that its destruction was imminent. In any case, Jindrich has been CCed to the FESCO ticket, so I'll just wait for a response there. Or maybe you aren't talking to me. I think it's too late in the morning for me to claim that it's too early in the morning for my brain to be working properly. I think I have to admit now that my brain is already entering full "Christmas vacation" mode. C'mon brain, back to work.... -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
