On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:42:14AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > However, you also miss my point. Adam's message was saying that the > guidelines forced people to use libexecdir and then went on to point out the > drawbacks of forcing specifically libexecdir on upstreams that didn't have that > coded in. So, as I said, in that context it's meaningless to bring up > arguments that are only addressed to libexecdir because %{_libdir} is an > alternative. I think you miss my point. Where consistency across architectures is desired, %{_libdir} isn't an option, so in the absence of an exception the guidelines force people to use libexec. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel