On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:13:27 -0700 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:55:22AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > >> Sorry, it must be too early in the morning for my brain to work > >> properly. What would I be asking FESCO to do? > > > > Decide between the two redundant and conflicting packagings of the > > same code. > > Ah, got it, thanks. Here's the ticket: > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/983 Well, IMHO reading the bug it just sounds like to me a mistake was made and the obsoletes/conflicts was not removed as intended: +* Sun Nov 4 2012 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-5-20121024 +- don't conflict with latexmk (#868996) (but that version didn't change obsoletes/conflicts at all) I'd suggest instead just mailing jnovy and asking if that was a mistake and if he could push the correct fix before jumping to conclusions. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
