Once upon a time, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosowski@xxxxxxxx> said: > Since busybox package already exists, I think it makes sense to use > it--not because we're doing some tiny-linux, but because why not, it's > just 651 kB. Most packages we discussed here (openssh-clients, sendmail) > are individually much larger than that. That's not a good reason to use busybox in a general install. It doesn't exactly duplicate the commands it offers, only a subset. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
