On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:59:26AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > I don't know if that is what you're after, because busybox > duplicates the functionality of individual packages (and may have > some limitations in how well it duplicates, I'm sure). All the same, > I would definitely consider including it---it's of course available > as a Fedora package. Well, this is part of what I mean by "Fedora is not a tiny-linux distribution." It might be interesting to have a busybox-based spin, but I think that's a different thing. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
