On 11/15/2012 11:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:59:26AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I don't know if that is what you're after, because busybox
duplicates the functionality of individual packages (and may have
some limitations in how well it duplicates, I'm sure). All the same,
I would definitely consider including it---it's of course available
as a Fedora package.
Well, this is part of what I mean by "Fedora is not a tiny-linux
distribution." It might be interesting to have a busybox-based spin, but I
think that's a different thing.
Since busybox package already exists, I think it makes sense to use
it--not because we're doing some tiny-linux, but because why not, it's
just 651 kB. Most packages we discussed here (openssh-clients, sendmail)
are individually much larger than that.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
