Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> It might be worth re-evaluating whether that's realistic any more,
> though, and whether we're _really_ committed to finally replacing
> network with NM in some kind of reasonable timeframe.

Until NM supports 802.1q, bridging, and tunnels, to name a few things
which AFAIK it does not yet, it isn't a suitable replacement.  If/when
it gets to the point it can handle all the things the basic network
service/scripts can do, then having it in @core could be revisited.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux