On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:16:55AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > However, I'm not sure that we can solve this kind of disconnect by a > > process change. > How about a general policy that planned regressions are not acceptable > unless explicitly approved by FESCo? Any feature that you want to remove > (temporarily or permanently) MUST be spelled out on the feature page. Here's the problem: if this is the requirement for a feature, then regressions will just be done as "it's not a feature, it's just the new version of upstream project X!" That doesn't buy anyone anything. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
