"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >The storage packages are going to be needed for the system to boot. > > > >Anaconda could probably add some smarts to remove authconfig if it wasn't > >pulled in by anything in the selected comps, but I'm not sure it'd be worth > >the special logic -- we might as well just put it in @core (even though it's > >not super-tiny). > > > >Firwealld I don't know about, though. If anaconda sets up the firewall using > >firewalld but then doesn't install it, will the old iptables scripts load > >the configuration? It'd be nice if it could, because firewalld is *another* > >big change that it'd be nice to have a reasonable back-out plan for. The point here is that both authconfig and firewalld are used by anaconda to configure the installed system, via either the old code (pre-F18) or the kickstart code (older releases, and F18+). anaconda would need to grow more complicated checks to ensure that certain things weren't set in the install before laying them down. > You might want to remove plymouth from the minimal install since it > does not make sense having it there anyway You filed a bug about that, actually... I'll respond here and paste there. plymouth was added to the minimal install as a consistent method for handling encrypted passphrases and boot-time logs at the time. Since this has moved out into other components since then, it can be reconsidered. There's something to be said for having a consistent boot-time interface though, rather than one that changes whether or not plymouth is installed. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
